In today’s hyper-competitive business landscape, the ability to break down internal silos and foster cross-functional collaboration is not just desirable—it’s essential. Companies are under immense pressure to innovate rapidly and adapt to evolving market demands, requiring them to function as unified entities where knowledge and resources flow seamlessly across departments. Yet, even the most established multinationals often struggle to manage their operations end-to-end, leading to sluggish customer interactions, delayed product delivery, and difficulties navigating new sales channels.
Improving organizational performance typically involves familiar strategies—setting ambitious targets, empowering cross-functional teams, standardizing processes, and tightening execution. However, the real challenge lies in executing these strategies effectively. Many companies face fragmented ownership of processes, parochial role designs, and internal complexities that stifle the collaboration needed to bridge the gap between departments. Traditional solutions like lean practices and business-process reengineering often fall short, either by overwhelming managers with exhaustive process rework or by focusing too narrowly on individual functions.
To overcome these challenges, companies must adopt new approaches that emphasize perspiration as much as inspiration. By putting in the hard work of aligning teams and processes while fostering a culture of creative collaboration, organizations can drive meaningful change. The successes of companies like Nvidia, which has excelled by integrating diverse teams to drive breakthroughs in AI and autonomous technologies, and Apple, whose seamless collaboration between hardware, software, and design teams has produced iconic products like the iPhone, offer key insights and best practices for achieving this. These organizations have not only fueled innovation but maintained a competitive edge by breaking down silos.
On the other hand, companies like Kodak serve as cautionary tales. Despite being a pioneer in digital photography, Kodak’s failure to encourage collaboration between its engineering, marketing, and strategic teams led to missed opportunities and, eventually, its downfall. The stark difference between companies that embrace collaboration and those that do not underscores the vital role it plays in driving innovation and ensuring long-term success.
In this article, we’ll explore how successful companies have harnessed cross-functional collaboration to overcome challenges, drive innovation, and differentiate themselves in competitive markets, while also examining the missteps of companies that failed to adapt. This exploration will provide actionable insights and strategies to help your organization foster collaboration, streamline processes, and secure a lasting competitive advantage.
At a communications-services company, executives were initially puzzled when feedback revealed that only 65 percent of customers successfully connected to a new premium fiber-optic product on their first attempt. Despite high scores in individual functions like sales, back-office operations, and logistics, the company struggled with weak collaboration and misaligned incentives. The issue was symptomatic of a broader problem: siloed teams that focused narrowly on their departmental objectives without considering the end-to-end customer experience.
To address these issues, the company set breakthrough targets aimed at uniting different teams and pushing them beyond their usual work practices. One key target was to halve the number of help requests to the call center following new installations. This required the sales, back-office, and field engineering teams to work together in ways they hadn’t before. The company established cross-functional teams responsible for controlling the installation process from the initial order to after-sales service. These teams, which had traditionally operated in separate workflows with little shared responsibility, were forced out of their comfort zones and into regular cross-functional meetings.
The impact of this collaboration was significant. First-time-right delivery increased from 65 percent to over 80 percent, customer satisfaction improved, and the number of help requests to the call center dropped by one-third. Furthermore, the company saw a reduction in operational costs due to fewer customer complaints and a smoother installation process. This case highlights the importance of focusing on how a single process breaks down across functions, rather than attempting to address multiple process issues within individual functions.
A global industrial company facing declining performance in key business areas realized that internal complexity was hampering its reputation for innovation. With 60 businesses, each with its own P&L, the company struggled with atomized processes and fragmented IT architectures, which limited the sharing of production or customer data. The siloed nature of these processes meant that each business unit was operating almost independently, often duplicating efforts and failing to capitalize on potential synergies.
To address these challenges, the company launched a multiyear business transformation built on a tightly specified architecture. This transformation involved identifying a few hundred combinations of global businesses and local markets, with executives in charge of each combination co-owning P&Ls. These executives were given the freedom to overturn conventional ways of working and forge cross-functional and cross-business combinations.
One business-market combination, facing threats from more efficient competitors, took the lead in redesigning its value chain end-to-end. By reducing the lead time for new products from up to 300 days to just 50 days, the company was able to plan more collaboratively with retailers, introduce platform-based product designs, and redesign regional supply chains. This radical shift in approach not only streamlined operations but also fostered innovation by encouraging different business units to share insights and best practices.
Within 18 months, this business-market combination turned around its performance, achieving a number-one market position with healthy margins. The company’s leaders noted that the key to success was not fundamentally new concepts but rather the mind-set and behavioral shifts that enabled broader collaboration. The ability to quickly bring new products to market was a significant competitive advantage, allowing the company to respond to market changes faster than its competitors. This case demonstrates how breaking down silos can lead to more efficient operations and drive innovation by facilitating the exchange of ideas and resources across the organization.
Without standardized processes, the variations in operating models across the company’s many businesses and geographical markets continued to hamper collaboration. To address this, the company consolidated more than 80 value-chain designations into seven distinct value chains that served as operational platforms for different business models. This standardization was crucial for enabling the company to scale its operations efficiently and ensure that all business units were aligned with the overall corporate strategy.
The team leaders identified cross-business processes that were truly distinctive, typically about 10 percent of the total, and allowed variations only where necessary to serve specific customer segments or satisfy regulatory requirements. The hundreds of other processes were slotted into standardized templates supported by readily available IT. This standardization led to simplified roles, shared performance metrics, and enhanced capability frameworks.
The changes had a striking impact on the company’s morale, ways of working, and performance. Multiple sales teams in a region, with transparent views into each other’s order books, were now able to negotiate deals collaboratively across a range of products. The greater transparency enabled health-services businesses to learn from the large-project capabilities of manufacturing-oriented units, and consumer-products businesses to share speed-to-market insights with other units.
Cross-functional collaboration is not only beneficial for improving operational efficiency but also serves as a catalyst for innovation. When teams from different functions work together, they bring diverse perspectives and expertise to the table, which can lead to the development of new ideas and solutions. This is particularly important in today’s business environment, where innovation is a key differentiator and a driver of competitive advantage.
For instance, a study conducted by McKinsey & Company found that companies with high levels of cross-functional collaboration are 50 percent more likely to report growth in their market share compared to those with low levels of collaboration. This is because cross-functional teams are better equipped to identify emerging market trends, customer needs, and technological advancements that can be leveraged to create new products and services.
Moreover, research from Harvard Business Review highlights that companies with more cross-boundary collaboration achieve greater customer loyalty and higher margins. This is because cross-functional teams can develop integrated solutions that meet the complex needs of customers, which is increasingly important in a globalized and digitalized economy. In fact, firms that foster cross-functional collaboration are found to be 1.5 times more likely to launch successful new products and services compared to their less collaborative counterparts.
Nvidia, a global leader in graphics processing technology, is a prime example of how cross-functional collaboration can drive innovation and business success. Over the years, Nvidia has transformed from a company primarily known for its gaming graphics cards into a major player in AI, data centers, and autonomous vehicles. This transformation was made possible through a concerted effort to break down silos and foster collaboration across different business units.
At Nvidia, cross-functional teams are central to the company’s innovation strategy. These teams bring together engineers, researchers, product managers, and marketing experts to work on cutting-edge projects. For example, the development of Nvidia’s CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture) platform, which has revolutionized parallel computing, was a result of collaboration between hardware and software teams. By working closely together, these teams were able to create a platform that could leverage the power of Nvidia’s GPUs for a wide range of applications, from gaming to scientific research.
The success of CUDA and other innovations has helped Nvidia become a dominant force in AI and machine learning. The company’s GPUs are now widely used in data centers and by researchers worldwide to train complex AI models. This would not have been possible without the cross-functional collaboration that allowed Nvidia to integrate hardware, software, and customer needs into a cohesive product offering.
In addition to product development, Nvidia’s cross-functional approach has also been crucial in entering new markets. When the company decided to move into the autonomous vehicle industry, it formed cross-functional teams that included experts in AI, automotive engineering, and safety regulations. These teams worked together to develop Nvidia’s DRIVE platform, which provides the computing power needed for autonomous vehicles. The DRIVE platform has since become a key component in the autonomous vehicle industry, used by many of the world’s leading automakers.
Nvidia’s success story highlights the importance of breaking down silos and fostering collaboration across different functions. By doing so, the company has been able to innovate rapidly and expand into new markets, maintaining its competitive edge in a fast-changing industry.
Establish Clear and Ambitious Targets: Setting clear and ambitious targets that require collaboration across functions is crucial. These targets should be tied to specific outcomes, such as reducing customer help requests or improving first-time-right delivery, to ensure accountability and focus. By aligning these targets with innovation goals, companies can foster a culture where collaboration is seen as a means to drive both efficiency and creativity.
Form Cross-Functional Teams: Cross-functional teams should be established to manage key processes from end to end. These teams must include representatives from all relevant functions and meet regularly to review performance and generate improvement ideas. To enhance innovation, these teams should also be encouraged to explore new ideas and challenge the status quo, rather than just focusing on existing processes.
Standardize Processes: Standardizing processes across the organization helps reduce complexity and enhance collaboration. This involves identifying truly distinctive processes that require variation and consolidating the rest into standardized templates supported by IT. Standardization also frees up resources and allows teams to focus on more strategic and innovative activities.
Promote a Collaborative Culture: Shifting mind-sets and behaviors is essential for fostering collaboration. This includes encouraging transparency, sharing knowledge across functions, and developing leadership capabilities that emphasize teamwork and regular feedback. Companies should also invest in training programs that equip employees with the skills needed to collaborate effectively, such as communication, problem-solving, and critical thinking.
Invest in Leadership Development: Investing in leadership development is key to sustaining cross-functional collaboration. Leaders should be trained to manage cross-functional teams, navigate complex organizational structures, and promote a culture of collaboration. This includes developing the ability to lead by example, encourage open communication, and resolve conflicts that may arise during the collaboration process.
Leverage Technology: Technology can play a crucial role in facilitating cross-functional collaboration. Tools such as project management software, collaboration platforms, and data analytics can help teams coordinate their efforts, share information, and track progress in real-time. By leveraging technology, companies can break down geographical barriers and enable collaboration across different locations and time zones.
One of the most infamous examples of how a lack of cross-functional collaboration can lead to the failure of a company is Kodak. Once a titan of the photography industry, Kodak’s inability to adapt to digital technology and innovate across its various departments ultimately led to its downfall.
Background
Kodak was a pioneer in photography, known for its dominance in the film market throughout much of the 20th century. The company’s slogan, “You press the button, we do the rest,” was iconic, and for decades, Kodak was synonymous with photography. However, as the world began to shift toward digital photography in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Kodak struggled to maintain its leadership position.
The Breakdown
Kodak’s failure was not due to a lack of technological foresight. In fact, Kodak was one of the first companies to develop digital photography technology; its engineers invented the first digital camera in 1975. However, the lack of cross-functional collaboration between Kodak’s various departments—particularly between the engineering teams that developed digital technology and the marketing and executive teams responsible for strategic decision-making—prevented the company from fully embracing and commercializing this innovation.
The film and digital divisions within Kodak operated largely in silos. The film division, which was responsible for the bulk of Kodak’s revenue, was reluctant to promote digital technology, fearing it would cannibalize the company’s profitable film business. Meanwhile, the digital division lacked the influence and support needed to push its products to the forefront of Kodak’s strategy. The marketing team, more aligned with the film division, continued to focus on traditional film products rather than aggressively promoting digital cameras and related technologies.
This lack of cross-functional collaboration created a significant disconnect within Kodak. The company was essentially at odds with itself—while it had the technological capabilities to lead the digital revolution, it failed to integrate this innovation into its overall business strategy. As a result, Kodak missed the opportunity to establish itself as a leader in the digital photography market.
The Consequences
By the time Kodak fully committed to digital photography, it was too late. Competitors like Sony, Canon, and Nikon had already captured significant market share, and Kodak was left playing catch-up. The company’s failure to break down silos and foster collaboration across its engineering, marketing, and executive teams resulted in a slow response to market changes and an inability to capitalize on its own innovations.
In 2012, Kodak filed for bankruptcy, marking the end of an era for a company that had once been a household name. While Kodak has since attempted to reinvent itself, its failure to adapt to the digital age remains a cautionary tale of how critical cross-functional collaboration is for innovation and long-term success.
In today’s fast-paced business world, cross-functional collaboration is not just a strategy—it’s the key to unlocking innovation and maintaining a competitive edge. Companies like Nvidia have thrived by breaking down silos and fostering collaboration across diverse teams, leading to groundbreaking advancements and market leadership. In stark contrast, Kodak’s failure to integrate its own innovative technologies across departments serves as a powerful reminder of the risks of staying siloed.
Think of your organization as a finely tuned machine, where each department is a crucial cog. When these cogs are aligned and working together, the machine operates at peak performance, driving remarkable outcomes. But when misaligned—whether through poor communication or conflicting goals—the entire system can falter, potentially leading to decline.
Reflect on your own organization: Are your teams truly aligned? Are they sharing knowledge and driving toward common objectives? By fostering a culture of collaboration, breaking down barriers, and supporting open communication, you can transform your organization into a powerhouse of innovation, ready to tackle future challenges.
The journey towards seamless collaboration isn’t easy, but the rewards are immense. The future belongs to those who can not only adapt to change but also shape it. Will you build the bridges that connect your teams and drive your organization forward, or will you risk stagnation by allowing silos to persist? The choice is yours—embrace the challenge and watch your organization achieve greatness.
EN 
ES